RESUMO
Although deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) and the subthalamic nucleus (STN) has become an established treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD), a recent meta-analysis of outcomes is lacking. To address this gap, we performed a meta-analysis of bilateral STN- and GPi-DBS studies published from 1990-08/2019. Studies with ≥10 subjects reporting Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) III motor scores at baseline and 6-12 months follow-up were included. Several outcome variables were analyzed and adverse events (AE) were summarized. 39 STN studies (2035 subjects) and 5 GPi studies (292 subjects) were eligible. UPDRS-II score after surgery in the stimulation-ON/medication-OFF state compared to preoperative medication-OFF state improved by 47% with STN-DBS and 18.5% with GPi-DBS. UPDRS-III score improved by 50.5% with STN-DBS and 29.8% with GPi-DBS. STN-DBS improved dyskinesia by 64%, daily OFF time by 69.1%, and quality of life measured by PDQ-39 by 22.2%, while Levodopa Equivalent Daily Dose (LEDD) was reduced by 50.0%. For GPi-DBS information regarding dyskinesia, OFF time, PDQ-39 and LEDD was insufficient for further analysis. Correlation analysis showed that preoperative L-dopa responsiveness was highly predictive of the STN-DBS motor outcome across all studies. Most common surgery-related AE were infection (5.1%) and intracranial hemorrhage (3.1%). Despite a series of technological advances, outcomes of modern surgery are still comparable with those of the early days of DBS. Recent changes in target selection with a preference of GPi in elderly patients with cognitive deficits and more psychiatric comorbidities require more published data for validation.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Different deep brain stimulation (DBS) targets have been suggested as treatment for patients with pharmacologically refractory Holmes tremor (HT). We report the clinical and quality of life (QoL) long-term (up to nine years) outcome in four patients with HT treated with DBS (in thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus-VIM or in dentato-rubro-thalamic tract-DRTT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patients underwent routine clinical evaluations before and after DBS (typically annually). Tremor severity and activities of daily living (ADL) were quantified by the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor-Rating-Scale (FTMTRS). QoL was assessed using the RAND SF-36-item Health Survey (RAND SF-36). In addition, we computed, in all four patients, the VTA based on the best stimulation settings using heuristic approaches included in the open source toolbox LEAD-DBS. RESULTS: In all patients, tremor and ADL improved significantly at one-year post-DBS follow-up (34-61% improvement in FTMTRS total score compared to baseline). In three out of four patients, the improvement of tremor was sustained no longer than two to three years and only in one patient was sustained up to nine years. In this patient, the largest intersection between VTA and DBS target has been observed. Scores for ADL deteriorated over the course of time, reaching worse levels compared to baseline already during the three-year post-DBS follow-up, in three out of four patients. Physical and mental health component scores of RAND SF-36 had very different outcome between patients and follow-ups and were not associated with tremor-related outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The benefits of DBS in HT might not be always long lasting. Although QoL slightly improved, this change seemed to be independent of the motor outcome following DBS. The estimation of DBS target and VTA proximity could be a useful tool for DBS clinicians in order to facilitate the DBS programming process and optimize DBS treatment.
